Thursday, May 4, 2017

YouTube Video Comment

"Edward Przydzial

mr. randazza needs to be asked only one question in my book and that is why exists... and he can't say it's freedom of speech or it's against suppression of the press...

when you go look at that site you'll see the horrid abuse of the internet along with the most hate filled, vile and nasty racist & bigotry ever put in the public domain. rumor has it mr. randazza is supporting and even helping this website... it's authors donald carlos seoane and michael tierney etc. say mr. randazza is deleting things online using dmca and copyright to remove blogs and other informations exposing pornwikileaks? well google, wordpress say legal requests to remove pornwikileaks victim informations was done through an attorney...

so pornwikileaks is allowed to defame, libel harass and threaten but if you post the facts about it your information is removed by dmca or copyright? using free speech as a weapon to allow pornwikileaks to stay online as well? someone needs to ask mr. randazza to state clearly if he is representing pornwikileaks or not and if he's involved in suppressing the victims of pornwikileaks... answer this mr. randazza because the public needs to know..."

Thursday, April 27, 2017

Marc Randazza had a Reckless Disregard for the TRUTH when, with ACTUAL MALICE, he maliciously DEFAMED his former client Crystal L. Cox. He KNEW for a FACT that what he was posting was NOT TRUE. Yet he Defamed me, Crystal Cox, his former client with ACTUAL MALICE.

Marc Randazza continues to be a hypocrite and seriously Full of SHIT.  It is EASY to prove Marc Randazza knew he was flat out LYING about Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein. I told him and sent him documents and he flat out lied to courts, national radio stations, blogs and the public at large WITH ACTUAL MALICE. Yet he was rewarded with top of the search engine domain names. Marc Randazza tortures, defames, harasses clients and whom ever he pleases, knowing full well of the ACTUAL truth. He does this to get his way, to win case, to set legal precedents and yet is above the law.

He violates his clients rights and defames private individuals and public figures and with ACTUAL Malice. No one has a case against Marc Randazza because he is slippery and in my OPINION corrupt and has Judges in his pocket and corner for whatever reason.

It is rumored that Randazza is one of the porn guys that started the rumor that Melania was an Escort as a model before marrying Trump. Oh well can't trust the rumor mill right?

Certainly CANNOT Trust Marc Randazza

Marc Randazza DOES NOT believe I have a right to disagree. HE DESTROYS the lives of woman who disagree with him or speak unfriendly about him.


This Video is Flat out LIES to get clients by a washed up, bankrupt, corrupt, bully, abusive, malicious attorney who is constantly HYPOCRITICAL. Don't believe a word he says. It is only an Advertisement and in NO Way should be taken as ACTUAL facts about Times vs. Sullivan, the First Amendment or your RIGHT to trash talk your human rights violating, corrupt, bullying attorney.

Marc Randazza LIED to WIPO and stole mass domain names, wiped out massive web content, STOLE intellectual property, and ruined my life and business as well as put me in constant stress and threats from his lies to the courts, and other entities regarding myself and Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein. Marc Randazza used his influence to STOMP Free SPEECH rights and Steal Intellectual Property and he did so KNOWING full well that what he was saying, swearing to and posting was false. He KNEW the facts and with ACTUAL Malice spread Defamatory LIES.

Mark Randazz: : You Can Learn From People You Don't Agree With


Sunday, January 29, 2017

Two Randazza Legal Group attorneys state (in a legal brief) their employer’s 7 year old child looks like a sex worker

"An Alexandra Mayers developing story…
In April of 2014, Jennifer Randazza (wife of Marc Randazza – the managing partner of Randazza Legal Group) attempted to intimidate me into silence (in regards to my reporting on Randazza Legal Group) by filing a frivolous civil court lawsuit against me… a lawsuit which Mrs. Randazza initially attempted to settle out of court for $500 (Clark County NV civil case A14699072C).
As of current, Jennifer Randazza is seeking a dollar amount just $200 shy of $500,000 (half a million dollars) from me due to my stating on twitter that she, her husband and Randazza Legal Group are attached to organized crime.
This month (December of 2016) two Randazza Legal Group attorneys (Alex J. Shepard and Ronald Green) openly and blatantly lied in a Damages Brief about a piece of computer generated parody I created that was entered as evidence into the lawsuit. Attorneys Shepard and Green stated on page 4 and page 8 of their client Jennifer Randazza’s Damages brief filed on December 16, 2016 into Clark County Nevada Civil case A14699072C that I depicted Mrs. Randazza’s toddler daughter (a female child between the ages of 3 and 7) as a sex worker. I clearly did not.
As you can see in the piece of computer generated parody above, there is clearly not an instance of a child between the age of 3 and 7 years old depicted anywhere in the graphic. In addition, Jennifer Randazza’s daughter is not named anywhere in the graphic. In fact, when the Judge who is presiding over this case (Judge Rob Bare) inquired with attorney Shepard as to whether or not he wanted to argue in court as to the facts of the piece of computer generated parody below – Shepard clearly stated THAT HE DID NOT (and I was standing right there in the court room when Judge Rob Bare was talking to Shepard about the issue).
Why is it that Alex J. Shepard and Ronald Green of Randazza Legal Group believe their employer's 7 year old daughter looks like Teagan Preseley - because she clearly DOES NOT!
Why is it that Alex J. Shepard and Ronald Green of Randazza Legal Group believe their employer’s 7 year old daughter looks like Teagan Preseley?
The reality is that for some reason attorneys Alex J. Shepard and Ronald Green of Randazza Legal Group think that it’s perfectly acceptable and OK for them to lie on Clark County Civil Court record to Judge Rob Bare.  Both Shepard and Green seem to also think that it’s OK and acceptable to state on court record that they believe their employer Marc Randazza and their client Jennifer Randazza’s 7 year old daughter is a doppelganger of a sex worker and pornstar (of the woman known as Teagan Presley specifically).
I still believe there’s just reason to investigate Marc Randazza in regards to his affiliation and apparent fascination with pedophiles.  In fact, considering what’s written on pages 4 and 8 of Jennifer Randazza’s Damages Brief in conjunction with a blog post by Marc Randazza titled “Pedo Privacy is Important Too” and an essay he once posted defending a book titled “The Pedophile’s Guide” – I wouldn’t be surprised in the least to hear about at least one of the Randazza’s doing jail time in the future.
attorneys Alex J. Shepard and Ronald Green clearly lie in Jennifer Randazza's damages brief for Clark county NV civil case A14699072C
attorneys Alex J. Shepard and Ronald Green clearly lie in Jennifer Randazza’s damages brief for Clark county NV civil case A14699072C
attorneys Alex J. Shepard and Ronald Green clearly lie AGAIN in Jennifer Randazza's damages brief for Clark county NV civil case A14699072C
attorneys Alex J. Shepard and Ronald Green clearly lie AGAIN in Jennifer Randazza’s damages brief for Clark county NV civil case A14699072C

Marc Randazza believes that pedophiles are entitled to their "rights"
Marc Randazza essay - The Pedophiles Guide defense
Source and More

Randazza Legal Group – porn industry lawyers who a BV Files blogger has linked to a coven of alleged stalkers & pedophiles - Monica Foster Reporting

"For the complete post from BV Files on Randazza Legal Group and his alleged ties to what appear to be a coven of stalkers and pedophiles from click here:

Below is a highlight from the posts:
About nine months ago, Some Random Person We’ve Never Heard Of Before filed a complaint with the State Bar of Nevada against revenge porn supporter Las Vegas attorney Marc Randazza.  We are pleased to tell you all that on April 19, 2016, a screening panel of the Nevada State Bar unanimously voted to accept this grievance and to initiate disbarment proceedings against Randazza, on behalf of Some Random Person, regarding allegations of violations of Nevada Rules of Professional Conduct 1.4 (Communication), 1.7 (Conflict of Interest: Current Clients), 1.8 (Conflict of Interest: Current Clients: Specific Rules), 1.10 (Imputation of Conflicts of Interest), 1.15 (Safekeeping Property), 1.16 (Declining or Terminating Representation), 2.1 (Advisor), 5.6 (Restrictions on Right to Practice), and 8.4 (Misconduct).
The State Bar will file a disciplinary complaint shortly.  Randazza will have a chance to respond to that and then a date for a formal hearing will be set.  Evidence is presented at the hearing, and a three-member panel (2 attorneys & 1 lay person) will decide on what discipline (if any) to impose on Randazza.
and another highlight from the post:
Why is Ken White of the Pope Hat blog a supporter of this man? Well it appears that Ken White is also a supporter of revenge pornography and the sexual blackmail of little girls due to him having Adam Steinbaugh as a member of his “blogging team.” As we all know, Steinbaugh was recently named in federal court papers as being one of McGibney’s confederates and fellow cyber-stalkers / harassers."


Check Out

Kinsale Insurance Company, VA ~ Marc J. Randazza Liability Insurance

Kinsale Insurance Company, VA ~ Marc J. Randazza Liability Insurance, Malpractice Insurance.

Well after all these years, we finally know who Marc J. Randazza's Liablity Insurance Carrier was when he represented me, Crystal L. Cox and when he sued Crystal L. Cox his former client. It appears to be Kinsale Insurance Company out of Richmond Virginia. 

How in the world is Marc Randazza still practicing law or anyone connected to him ? WOW.

However, Imperium Insurance Company, York Professional Liablity Group, was Randazza's Liability carrier when the Nevada Federal Courts finally accepted my counterclaim and malpractice suit so maybe they are the one's liable for what Marc Randazza did to me.

Click Below to Download the Court Filing, filed by Attorneys for Clay Douglass showing Marc J. Randazza, Randazza Legal Group Liability Insurance Carrier.

Did Marc Randazza represent me, Crystal Cox? 
Well according to him he sure did.

Click Below and check out the eMail in the exhibit to the court


Exhibit 1 shows that Eugene Volokh, attorney and UCLA Law Professor clearly thought Marc Randazza was Crystal Cox’s attorney. Volokh claimed that he had a long talk with Randazza and Randazza told him that he represented Cox. Click Below

Friday, August 19, 2016

Clark County Nevada Judge Rob Bare completely discredits Randazza Legal Group’s key witness of civil case A-14-699072-C

"Randazza Legal Group named domestic violence assailant Ari Scott Bass aka Michael Whiteacre as their key witness for their April 2014 frivolous and fraudulent lawsuit filed by attorney Marc Randazza’s wife (Jennifer Randazza) against independent investigative blogger Alexandra Mayers (Clark county Civil court case A-14-699072-C).
The Clark County Nevada Judge assigned to the lawsuit is the honorable Judge Rob Bare.
Ironically, on March 7, 2014 a ruling by Judge Rob Bare completely discredited Ari Scott Bass aka Michael Whiteacre in a separate legal matter (which involves him physically assaulting his wife and sex trafficking victim – well known prostitute Christina Parreira).
That’s right – the only witness Randazza Legal Group was able to find to face Alexandra Mayers in a United States court of law, was no more than some loser porn industry fanboi who thought he could get away with physically assaulting his meal ticket (a woman he married and pimped repeatedly into to Dennis Hof’s brothels).
Way to go Randazza Legal Group…
randazza legal group ari scott bass porn attorney parody
’nuff said.
This matter came before the Court on January 20, 2016 and Court took matter under advisement. After carefully considering the papers submitted and hearing arguments, Court issued its Decision this 7th day of March, 2016. COURT ORDERED, Appellant’s conviction is AFFIRMED and REMANDED back to the lower court for any further proceedings. The standard of review on appeal challenging sufficiency of the evidence is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Koza v. State, 100 Nev. 245, 250, 681 P.2d 44, 47 (1984). It is not the purview of this Court to weigh the evidence or to re-examine the credibility of witnesses. Lay v. State, 110 Nev. 1189, 1192, 886 P.2d 448, 450 (1994). In this case, this Court finds that after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found Appellant guiltySpecifically, the 911 call that the victim made the night of the incident was played and the victim told the dispatcher that, He grabbed me today, putting his hand around my neck, again, and threw me down on the floor. Additionally, Officer Miller observed that the victim had visible injuries in the form of redness and scratches on her right elbow and arm area. Furthermore, this Court will not reweigh the evidence or re-examine the credibility of witnesses. Therefore, a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt and Appellant’s conviction is affirmed. Counsel for Respondent is directed to submit a proposed Order consistent with the foregoing which sets forth the underpinnings of the same in accordance herewith and with counsel s briefing and argument. A Status Check Re: Order is set for May 4, 2016 in chambers. Parties need not appear. 5/4/16 (CHAMBERS) – STATUS CHECK RE.: ORDER CLERK’S NOTE: Counsel is to ensure a copy of the forgoing minute order is distributed to all interested parties; additionally, a copy of the foregoing minute order was distributed to the Service Recipients via the Wiznet E-Service (3/7/16 amn).